Table of Contents
I would certainly include Toyota 2/3TC motor is somewhere in the leading three but with those domestics you certainly have my top four of all time for dependability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine issue. Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's very own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do every little thing I require this truck to do patgizz created: 3 points in the vehicle globe refuse to damage.
those should be held as the criteria to which everything else is measured. however, almost every little thing else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, as a result of the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I acquired it, right here's the advertisement lmk what you guys believe Oops, really did not mean to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm relatively big, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly slim ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only issue I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also tough and they would snap right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage will not be the most effective on the planet, yet it will certainly damn sure run permanently. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I constantly had lots of space in the taxi of them. wbjones wrote: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I wonder just how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own means ... The engine bay wasn't developed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One container remove an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, but it draws. Mod electric motors require ahead out sidewards and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
"They are usually dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Corrosion is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply appeared like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 freeway with the OD5. I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very very confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to chat about a couple of problems of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is much better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same lorry.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. Let's talk regarding engine and in fact just to define that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you understand, around that time as well. Because 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which caused problems.
Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with each in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're mosting likely to discuss a couple of issues of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to appear and claim one is better than the various other. So if that's what you're searching for, you'll need to wait. Mark: So what are several of the differences between these 2 brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same automobile.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Let's chat concerning engine and really simply to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you know, around that time too. So we're not going to get back into, into the earlier stuff. Given that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more preferred and I wouldn't truly advise a V6 engine.
There's a great deal of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the spark plug, which caused troubles.
Table of Contents
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealer
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealer

